Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1985No. 84-181, 84-238PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROONEY, Justice.

Appellant Wayne Tompkins pled guilty to possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of § 35-7-1031(a)(ii), W.S.1977, but reserved the right to appeal the constitutional issues arising from the search of the Tompkins’ property. Appellant Curtis Tompkins was convicted, by a jury, of aiding and abetting in the possession of a controlled substance, marijuana, with the intent to deliver, in violation of §§ 6-l-201(a) and (b)(ii) and 35-7-1031(a)(ii), W.S.1977.

We reverse in part and affirm in part.

The Fremont County Sheriff’s Department received…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Parkhurst v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hampton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ochoa v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Davila v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Virgilio v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Zanetti v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API