Dreisbach v. Ross
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 161, Jan. T., 1899, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Carbon Co., Oct. T., 1897, No. 1, on bill in equity, in suit of J. M. Dreisbach v. David Ross et al. Bill in equity for an injunction, to restrain a sale of electric light poles and wires thereon situated in the borough of Lehighton to the borough.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 161, Jan. T., 1899, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Carbon Co., Oct. T., 1897, No. 1, on bill in equity, in suit of J. M. Dreisbach v. David Ross et al. Bill in equity for an injunction, to restrain a sale of electric light poles and wires thereon situated in the borough of Lehighton to the borough. From the record it appeared that the Carbon County Improvement Company, Limited, a joint stock association organized under the act of June 2, 1874, owned an electric light plant in the borough of Weissport, and also the poles and wires in controversy in Lehighton, which was on the…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
The learned court below found as a fact, “that the electric light line,'poles, wires, dynamos, etc., form a part of the electric light ■ plant, late the property of the Carbon County Improvement Company, Limited, and are appurtenant thereto, and are covered by the mortgage aforesaid, and form part of the security pledged to secure the payment of the bonds secured by the mortgage aforesaid and the interest thereon, as well as all the machinery and fixtures in and upon said mortgaged property.” And the court further found, “that the electric light *281pole line, in the borough of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Trask v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Stearns Lighting & Power Co. v. Central Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Bernin v. GuarinoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1921