Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Manos

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 28, 1958No. 10,072Published

1ConcurrenceLatimer, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result.

Because my reasons for reversing this conviction are so different from those announced by my associates, I prefer to set out fully the theory which leads to my concurrence in the Court’s disposition. We granted the prayer for review to consider two questions, and I will answer them in order. They are:

1. Is negligent indecent exposure a crime at military law?

2. If so, is the evidence sufficient in this case to support such a finding?

We have previously decided that willful indecent exposure is a crime at military law. United States v Brown, 3…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. SchumacherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. DoyleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. FlemingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API