United States v. Manos
United States Court of Military Appeals
1ConcurrenceLatimer, Judge
(concurring in the result) :
I concur in the result.
Because my reasons for reversing this conviction are so different from those announced by my associates, I prefer to set out fully the theory which leads to my concurrence in the Court’s disposition. We granted the prayer for review to consider two questions, and I will answer them in order. They are:
1. Is negligent indecent exposure a crime at military law?
2. If so, is the evidence sufficient in this case to support such a finding?
We have previously decided that willful indecent exposure is a crime at military law. United States v Brown, 3…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. SchumacherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. DoyleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. FlemingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.