Legal Opinion

Fox v. Higgins

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1967No. 8366PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Judge.

This is an action brought against the defendants for malicious interference with the plaintiff’s business. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for the plaintiff against both of the defendants jointly for actual damages in the sum of $20,000, and for punitive damages in the sum of $7,500 against the defendant William Higgins and for $39,500 against the defendant Milton K. Higgins.

The defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. This motion was denied, and this appeal is taken from the judgment entered on the…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Curtis v. FirthIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Osland v. OslandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bismarck Realty Co. v. FoldenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. BASF Corp. v. SymingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API