Lucas v. Durabond Products Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
WEBER, Chief Judge.
In this case the defendant has moved to require the dismissal of this case because it is not brought by the real party in interest as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 17(a). A real party in interest in this case is the plaintiff’s employer (or its insurance carrier) who seeks by this action to recover a large sum of money from the defendant as their subrogation right.
An abundant body of case law holds that a party holding a subrogation interest, either whole or partial, is the real party in interest. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 338 U.S. 366, 70…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Smith v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Lipari v. Niagara Machine & Tool WorksDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Neal to Use v. B.R. P. Rwy. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Insurance From CNA v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Insurance From CNA v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Wolfe, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1988