Lyman v. Coolidge
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Petition in equity, by the administrator de-bonis non with the will annexed of Susan B. Lyman, asking instructions as to the construction thereof. Hearing before Lathrop, J., who reserved the ease for the consideration of the full court.
1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.
The question in this case is as to the construction to be given to the will and codicils of Susan B. Lyman. The clause more particularly in controversy is the eleventh clause of the third codicil, which is as follows: “ I hereby revoke the residuary clauses in my will and codicils, and in lieu thereof I hereby give all the rest and residue of my estate remaining after the payment of the specific legacies provided in my will and the several codicils thereto, as follows : One third thereof *8to my nephew Joseph Randolph Coolidge. One third thereof to my nephew Algernon Sidney Coolidge. One sixth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stratton v. Physio-Medical CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Frost v. CourtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Powers v. CodwiseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Smith v. HaynesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Upham v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Best v. BerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Worcester Trust Co. v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Cushman v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Stanwood v. StanwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.