Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, OPINION, AND ORDER
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
Alice in Wonderland has nothing on section 518 of the New York General Business Law. Under the most plausible interpretation of that section, if a vendor is willing to sell a product for $100 cash but *436charges $102 when the purchaser pays with a credit card, the vendor risks prosecution if it tells the purchaser that the vendor is adding a 2% surcharge because the credit card companies charge the vendor a 2% “swipe fee.” But if, instead, the vendor tells the purchaser that its regular price for the product is $102, but…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Expressions Hair Design v. SchneidermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Italian Colors Restaurant v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Expressions Hair Design v. SchneidermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Quinteros v. MBI Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- In re Payment Card Interchange Fee & Merchant Discount Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.