Legal Opinion
Hester v. Ross
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 21, 1973No. 5239PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from summary judgment that he fake nothing in suit for damages for asserted fraud by defendants, in securing a judgment against plaintiff in a prior case.
*379In 1966 Federal Sign, represented by attorneys Ross, Banks, Cron and Cavin, sued Pine Center Inc. for money due on a sign lease contract, and sued W. F. Hester as a guarantor of the contract. Default judgment was entered against Pine Center and Hester on January 30, 1967.
In 1972 plaintiff Hester filed this suit against defendants Federal Sign and their attorneys, alleging fraud in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Straus-Frank Co. v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
- Straus-Frank Co. v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Brill v. Guaranty State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Reed v. RoarkTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- General Bonding & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Beckville Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. Dahlstrom Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Borden Metal Products Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. Dahlstrom Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978