Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. AIG Domestic Claims, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided January 27, 2006No. 051306BLS2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gants, Ralph D., J.

The plaintiffs, Marcia and Harold Rhodes, both individually and on behalf of their daughter, Rebecca Rhodes (collectively, “the Rhodes”), have moved to compel the defendants — AIG Domestic Claims, Inc. (“AIG”), National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”), and Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”) — to produce various documents that have been withheld based on various claims of privilege. After hearing, the Rhodes’ motion to compel is ALLOWED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

BACKGROUND

This case has a long and complex history, which is…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schoenstein v. SchillingMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009
  2. Ace American Insurance v. Riley Bros.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2012
  3. Greenleaf Arms Realty Trust I, LLC v. New Boston Fund, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2012
  4. Karen Rain v. Connecticut General CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
  5. Roller Bearing Company of America, Inc. v. Raytheon CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API