Legal Opinion

McCoy, Admr. v. Faulkenberg

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1935No. 4874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MATTHEWS, J.

The plaintiff was the husband of the decedent and was also a guest in this automobile at the time of the accident, sitting beside his wife. His testimony is the most favorable to the plaintiff on the subject of the conduct of the defendant and the manner in which he operated the automobile. We, therefore, deem it sufficient for the purpose of disposing of this proceeding to quote from his testimony on this subject. His testimony was:

“A. We all sat around in a circle, I played the Ukelele and we all sang, drank a gin highball, just spent a nice evening there.

Q. How many…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Bordonaro v. SenkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Covington v. CarleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
  2. MacKey v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Ernest v. BellvilleOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Hamby v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Zalewski v. YanceyOhio Court of Appeals · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API