Legal Opinion

Sheldon v. Messerschmidt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1918No. 2973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Sheldon, seeks to enjoin the maintenance of certain improvements placed by the defendants ’ upon tidelands immediately in front of and abutting land claimed by appellant under a homestead near Juneau, Alaska. On the trial these facts were adduced:

Plaintiff owns 47.34 acres of land on Gastineaux Channel, an arm of the Pacific Ocean, and owns upland having a water frontage of about 2,065 feet on Gastineaux Channel. Defendants’ structures consist of piles and caps upon two strips of tidelands, one of 106 and the other of 70 *659feet in length, and it is charged that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dalton v. HazeletCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  2. Columbia Canning Co. v. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  3. Worthen Lumber Mills v. Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  4. Barron v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berger v. OhlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  2. Berger v. OhlsonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1939
  3. Arness v. Petersburg Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
  4. Strong v. GilmoreDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API