Legal Opinion

Humphries v. Ables

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 2003No. 48A05-0206-CV-278Published

1Opinion of the Court

789 N.E.2d 1025 (2003)

Marc D. HUMPHRIES and Kelle R. Humphries, Appellants-Defendants,

v.

Max D. ABLES and Betty A. Ables, Appellees-Plaintiffs.

No. 48A05-0206-CV-278.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

June 16, 2003.

Patrick R. Ragains, Smith & Ragains, Anderson, IN, Attorney for Appellants.

David W. Stone IV, Stone Law Office Anderson, IN, Attorney for Appellees.

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Max and Betty Ables (the "Sellers") are the owners of Frankton Liquor in Frankton, Indiana. Prior to its use as a liquor store, the property had been the site of a gasoline station. When the station closed in 1964, the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Migatz v. StieglitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Humphries v. AblesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Smith v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Stoll v. GrimmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API