Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Deagle

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 26, 1980PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The convictions of both defendants of assault must be reversed because of the refusal of the trial judge to instruct the jury on the burden of proof on the issue of self-defense.

A jury found Stephen Deagle and Joseph Gibson guilty on so much of separate indictments charging armed robbery as alleged simple assaults on Dana B. Reis. An examination of the evidence, viewed as it must be in this type of case, in the light most favorable to the defendants, Commonwealth v. Monico, 373 Mass. 298, 299-300 (1977); Commonwealth v. Harrington, 379 Mass. 446, 450 (1980), reveals the following scenario.

It…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. MejiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. GalvinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API