Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Selecto Scientific
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 15, 2011No. A10A2180PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
Andrew Phillips appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint for breach of contract against Selecto Scientific (“Selecto”), on the ground that he is not a real party in interest. Phillips also appeals from the trial court’s rulings regarding discovery and the award of attorney fees to Selecto. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal of Phillips’s complaint, but affirm the trial court’s ruling with respect to discovery and the award of attorney fees.
The record reveals that Selecto offered Phillips six months of employment beginning…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wirth v. CACH, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America v. RiedlSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Hodgskin v. Markatron, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia v. AmbatiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Mansell 400 Associates, L.P. v. Entex Information Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- AIG Specialty Insurance Company v. Pegatron CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021
- D.C. Micro Development, Inc. v. BrileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- FOLEY COMMONS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CATHERINE M. KRAMARICHCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
- HUGES CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. BLACKBURNE & SONS REALTY CAPITAL CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
- Mary Harman Beard, as of the Estate of James H. Beard, III v. Harriet H. Rondowsky, as Co-Trustee of the Charles C. Harman TrustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019