Mi Familia Vota v. Fontes
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Mi Familia Vota, et al., No. CV-21-01423-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Katie Hobbs, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Rule 54(b) motion for entry of judgment 16 on dismissed claims. (Doc. 174.) For the following reasons, the motion is denied. 17 RELEVANT BACKGROUND 18 This action involves a challenge to two voting laws that were enacted by the Arizona 19 legislature following the 2020 election. The first is Senate Bill 1485, which provides that 20 voters who do not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. William R. Ponsoldt, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Braswell Shipyards, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Deborah Wood v. Gcc Bend, Llc, an Oregon Limited Liability CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.