Legal Opinion

People v. Whitsitt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1960No. Docket 58, Calendar 48,078PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Counsel for appellant (defendant Louis Whitsitt) has favored us with an excellent and helpful brief. The statement of facts set forth therein is sufficient as well as accurate, and, since it is not traversed by tbe people according to the requirements of Court Rule No 68 (1945), I would accept it for tbe purposes of present decision (see section 2 of Court Rule No 67 [1945], as amended April 15, 1959, effective July 1, 1959. )

So much of appellant’s said statement as is deemed requisite for present purposes is quoted as follows:

“Louis Whitsitt, a 17-year-old youth, was brought before Macomb…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crooker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Herman v. ClaudySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. People v. CrandellMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. People v. ParshayMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. CarsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. HunnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API