Legal Opinion

Backus v. Duffy

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1930No. Docket No. 6992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.STURTEVANT, J.

This is an action brought to recover rent. On the twenty-sixth day of February, 1923, R. L. Collins leased to W. 0. Backus the premises known as 667 Geary Street. By the provisions of the lease the term commenced May 1, 1923, and ended May 1, 1928. The rental reserved was $150 per month during the time from December 1, 1924, to the end of the lease. It contained many covenants. One of those covenants was to pay the rent promptly, and continuing it provided: “ . . . and in the event of the failure of the lessee so to do, or in the event of a breach of any of the other covenants…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Davis v. VidalTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Jeffers v. Easton, Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Dunlap v. BullardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Barkhaus v. Producers Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Parry v. Berkeley Hall School FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Taylor v. Continental Southern Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Steven Voloudakis and Katherine Voloudakis v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Indian Refining Co. v. Mary G. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API