Legal Opinion
Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Hodel
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1987No. Nos. 85-1712, 85-1713PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
On April 12, 1976, the Jicarilla Apache Tribe brought suit to cancel certain oil and gas leases on the Jicarilla Apache Reservation because of the failure of the United States Department of the Interior to adequately advertise the lease sales under which the leases were issued. In Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Andrus, 546 F.Supp. 569 (D.N.M.1980), the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico determined that the lease bonuses in question were undervalued, but that the leases could be preserved through payment of increased bonuses. Id. at 580. We affirmed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gilbert McClendon Bernadine F. McClendon Norman McDanel Connie R. McDanel v. United States of America Colorado River Indian Tribal CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Jim Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Gallegos v. Pueblo of TesuqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Enterprise Management Consultants, Inc. v. United States ex rel. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Srader v. VerantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.