Legal Opinion

Skillen v. Water-Works Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, C. J.

This was an action by appellant against appellee, based upon a contract made with Henry R. Selden and others, trustees of the Indiana Central Canal Company, on the 20th of March, 1860, to recover damages for an alleged breach of said contract.

It granted, demised, and leased to the appellant, for the term of twenty years from- the 1st day of August, 1861, upon the conditions contained therein, “ sufficient water from the Indiana Central Canal, in the city of Indianapolis, to furnish motive power for two run of millstones, grinding at the rate of ten bushels per hour each of good, dry white…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Doupe v. . GeninNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Mumford v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  3. Estep v. EstepIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Moffatt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. Womack v. McQuarryIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoagland v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Fishback v. WoodruffIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Matt v. BarlowNevada Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API