Legal Opinion

Yellow Aster Min. & Mill. Co. v. Winchell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California

Decided June 12, 1899No. 776Published

On Demurrer to Bill.

1Opinion of the Court

BOSS, Circuit Judge.

The fact that this suit was brought under and by virtue of section 2326 of the Revised Statutes of the United States does not, I think, exempt the complainant from the necessity of showing that the value of the property in controversy is sufficient to bring it within the requirement of the general statute prescribing the jurisdiction of the circuit courts of the United States. Mining Co. v. Rutter, 31 C. C. A. 223, 87 Fed. 801; Chambers v. Harrington, 111 U. S. 350, 4 Sup. Ct. 428; Strasburger v. Beecher, 44 Fed. 213; Burke v. Concentrating Co., 46 Fed. 644. Whether…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chambers v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Shoshone Min. Co. v. RutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  3. Burke v. Bunker Hill & S. Mining & Concentrating Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1891
  4. Strasburger v. BeecherU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API