Legal Opinion

S. Catanzaro & Sons, Inc. v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1924No. Appeal, 128PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, in a feigned issue framed to determine which of the parties was entitled to a fund in court. The litigants agree that the facts are not in dispute; stating them most favorably to appellant, they are as follows:

A consignee sold several lots of goods belonging to his consignor; instead of sending the proceeds to the latter, the consignee deposited them in his own bank account, and sent the consignor five checks covering the amount. Before any of the checks were presented to the bank on which they were drawn,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Webb v. NewhallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. First National Bank v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  3. Hemphill v. YerkesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Tibby Bros. Glass Co. v. Farmers & Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Maginn v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joseph Melnick Building & Loan Ass'n v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Eppinger v. Allen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1927
  3. Kassow v. Integrity Trust Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API