Legal Opinion
Soto-Ocasio v. Federal Express Corp.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 16, 1998No. 97-2280PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Ivette Soto-Oeasio (“Soto”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Federal Express Corp. (“Federal Express” or “the company”). Plaintiff had claimed that Federal Express failed to provide a reasonable accommodation to her known physical limitations, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA” or “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12117, and Puerto Rico law. We affirm.
I
The following facts are undisputed. In June 1988 plaintiff began working for Federal Express as a full-time operations agent at its Borinquen Station…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Charlie Milton v. Scrivner, Inc., Gary Massey v. Scrivner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Irving August v. Offices Unlimited, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Shirley Weigel v. Target Stores, a Division of Dayton Hudson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Amego, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- McBride v. BIC Consumer Products Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Zenaida Garc A-Ayala v. Lederle Parenterals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Sánchez-Rodríguez v. AT & T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Rosemary Feliciano v. State of Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Ward v. Massachusetts Health Research Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.