Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Hobart Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided January 23, 1998No. 03-97-00018-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, Chief Justice.

This is a dispute over franchise taxes the Comptroller of the State of Texas assessed against both Hobart Corporation and Pre-mark FEG Corporation, appellees. The trial court ordered a refund to Premark FEG Corporation and the Comptroller 1 appeals. We will affirm the judgment of the trial court.

BACKGROUND

Before December 30, 1989, Premark FEG Corporation did business in Texas under the name “Hobart Corporation.” On that date, Premark stopped doing business in Texas, transferred all its assets and liabilities to a new corporation, and became a holding company for the new…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In the Interest of W.E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Baldwin, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  2. Save Our Springs Alliance, Inc. v. Lazy Nine Municipal Utility District Ex Rel. Board of Directors, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  3. Air Park-Dallas Zoning Committee v. Crow-Billingsley Airpark, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  4. Rylander v. Bandag Licensing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  5. Moore v. Jet Stream Investments, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API