Brown v. C. T. Elliott
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The facts, which involve the validity of an indictment under § 5440 Rev. Stat., are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court 1
225 U.S. 392
32 S.Ct. 812
56 L.Ed. 1136
FRANK W. BROWN, Appt.,
v.
C. T. ELLIOTT, United States Marshal in and for the Northern District of California, et al. NO 201. E. C. MOORE, Appt., v. C. T. ELLIOTT, United States Marshal in and for the Northern District of California, et al. NO 202.
Nos. 201 and 202.
Argued October 19, 1911.
Ordered for reargument before a full bench December 18, 1911.
Reargued May 1, 1912.
Decided June 10, 1912.
Messrs. Henry F. Woodard and Arthur A. Birney for appellants.
Solicitor General Lehmann for appellees.
2Opinion of the Court · McKennaJustice McKenna
1
These appeals involve the action of the circuit court in dismissing…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Hyde and Schneider v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Lonabaugh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.