Legal Opinion

Baron v. Dyslin

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 28, 1983No. 0007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

The appellant Elizabeth Baron appeals the family court’s finding that the respondent Royce Arol Dyslin (Dyslin) is not the father of her minor child, the respondent Tamara Erin Dyslin. She also appeals the lower court’s denial of child support. We reverse and remand the case to the family court.

Because this is an equity action tried by the family court judge alone without a reference, the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to find facts in accordance with its views of the preponderance of the evidence. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Johnson, 275 S. C. 7, 266 S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Davis v. HollowaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. White v. BosemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Corley v. RoweCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Eleazer v. Hardaway Concrete Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Hudson v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Abercrombie v. LaboonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Evans v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API