Legal Opinion

Deutmann v. Kilpatrick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1891PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the 81. Louis City Circuit Court.— Hon. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

The plaintiff contracted to erect a building for the defendant in conformity with certain plans and specifications for the sum of $3,400. He built the house, and was paid the amount specified. When he received the last install ment he executed a receipt containing the following recital: “ The above is in full for all claims against R. J. Kilpatrick, and against the building and property upon which said work was and is done, and all time, labor and materials, furnished therefor and thereon.” The plaintiff thereafter instituted the present suit to recover $104.75 for extra work on said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riley v. KershawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Kronenberger v. BinzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Sedalia Brewing Co. v. Sedalia Water Works Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Michael v. St. Louis Mutual Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Mathews v. DanahyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brewington v. MeskerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. GossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BuckstaffNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. D. N. Lightfoot & Son v. Edward Hurd & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Hodges v. TruaxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API