Legal Opinion

Boylan v. Martindale

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 22, 1982No. 81-323PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reinhard

Plaintiff sued defendants Grace Martindale, the City of Elmhurst, Illinois Bell Telephone Company, and Commonwealth Edison Company for injuries suffered by his incompetent in an automobile accident at the intersection of North and Myrtle Avenues in the City of Elmhurst. The trial court dismissed counts III and VI of plaintiffs fourth amended complaint against the city of Elmhurst, counts IV and VII against Illinois Bell Telephone Company, and counts V and VIII against Commonwealth Edison Company, all for failure to state a cause of action. The court also granted Elmhurst’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Cunis v. BrennanIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Fooden v. Board of GovernorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Carruthers v. B. C. Christopher & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Ziemba v. MierzwaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Curtis v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Gouge v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lindenmier v. City of RockfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Duncavage v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API