State v. Ervin

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} Defendant appeals his convictions for criminal sexual penetration of a child under thirteen, kidnapping, false imprisonment, and bribery of a witness. On appeal, Defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying Defendant’s motion for a statement of facts and in limiting the scope of defense counsel’s cross-examination of the victim. Defendant also claims his counsel were ineffective. We affirm the convictions.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

{2} In November 1996, the child (Victim), then eleven years old, told his legal guardian (Guardian) that Defendant had sexually…