Legal Opinion

Pecenik v. Adam

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided January 15, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Samuel Greenstein, J.

The issue before the court in this instant motion is whether, upon consent of the parties, a nonpayment summary proceeding can be “converted” into a holdover proceeding. The proceeding for nonpayment of rent in this instant matter was commenced by petitioner in mid-July, 1980, against respondent. When the parties appeared in the Landlord and Tenant Part of the Civil Court in early August, 1980, they entered into a written stipulation to “convert” the nonpayment proceeding into a holdover proceeding. The warrant of eviction was stayed until October 12,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RougeronNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Moore v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Jackson v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976
  4. Matter of Newham v. . Chile Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Taylor Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. DirendeJustice Court of Village of Pound Ridge · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API