Pecenik v. Adam
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Samuel Greenstein, J.
The issue before the court in this instant motion is whether, upon consent of the parties, a nonpayment summary proceeding can be “converted” into a holdover proceeding. The proceeding for nonpayment of rent in this instant matter was commenced by petitioner in mid-July, 1980, against respondent. When the parties appeared in the Landlord and Tenant Part of the Civil Court in early August, 1980, they entered into a written stipulation to “convert” the nonpayment proceeding into a holdover proceeding. The warrant of eviction was stayed until October 12,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re the Estate of RougeronNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Moore v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Jackson v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976
- Matter of Newham v. . Chile Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Taylor Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. DirendeJustice Court of Village of Pound Ridge · 2015