United States v. Gary Debenedetto
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Government has filed a Petition for Panel Rehearing requesting that we amend our opinion of March 3, 2014, to reflect that the Government never was ordered to respond to Mr. Debenedetto’s motion to stay. It also requests that we designate our March 3 opinion as nonpre-cedential. The Government explains that it did not have an opportunity to address fully the issue of whether, in assessing the importance of the Government’s interests under the first prong of the analysis under Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166, 123 S.Ct. 2174, 156 L.Ed.2d 197 (2003), the district court should focus…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Ruiz-GaxiolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Darlene FiesteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- State v. HoldenConnecticut Superior Court · 2014
- GARY DEBENEDETTO v. WILLIAM MARSHALL, et al.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026