Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Syver

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1953PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiffs submit that the document which they signed was not a contract but only an offer to purchase which they rescinded before it was accepted. It is not an instrument to do credit to a lawyer but we agree with the learned trial court in holding it to be a sales contract, as it describes itself to be, identifying property to be sold, specifying the terms of payment, signed by the contracting parties, and partly performed by the buyers. The signing by the seller and his receipt of part of the purchase price cannot reasonably be interpreted as anything but an acceptance of the buyers’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodman v. Blue Grass Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Gifford v. StraubWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Kuester v. RowlandsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Pierson v. DorffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Vines v. Orchard Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Quillen v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Kutzin v. PirnieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Doyle v. WohlrabeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Megal v. KohlhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API