Zang v. Railway Express Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Since an interstate shipment of property is involved in this case, Federal laws are controlling. Toledo & Ohio Central Ry. Co. v. S. J. Killer & Bros. Co., 97 Ohio St., 262, 119 N. E., 733; Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, 226 U. S., 491, 33 S. Ct., 148, 57 L. Ed., 314, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.), 257. Paragraph 11, Section 20, Title 49 of the United States Code has particular application. This paragraph in its original form was known as the “Carmack Amendment,” and fixes the duties, liabilities, etc., of common carriers, railroads and transportation companies as to interstate shipments of property…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States Ex Rel. Louisville Cement Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- L.M. Kirkpatrick Co. v. I.C.R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940
- Patton v. Pennsylvania Greyhound LinesOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Midstate Horticultural Co.California Supreme Court · 1942