Legal Opinion
Ralto Developers, Inc. v. Environmental Impact Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 6, 1991No. 14155PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether General Statutes § 22a-43 (c)1 authorizes a trial court to approve a proposed withdrawal or settlement of an appeal from a decision of an inland wetlands agency when not all the parties have agreed to that proposed withdrawal or settlement. We conclude that the statute does not permit such approval without the *56consent of all parties to the appeal and accordingly reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The court reasonably could have found the following facts. The plaintiff, Ralto Developers, Inc. (Ralto), owned a tract of land in Danbury. Ralto…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- University of Connecticut v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
3Cited by23 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. GuckianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.