Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Kellogg

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 19, 1941No. 9659PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

The Commissioner seeks a review of a redetermination by the Board of Tax Appeals of a deficiency determined by him of the tax due on income of F. W. Kellogg,1 hereafter called taxpayer, for the tax year 1935.

Taxpayer’s petition to the Board for the redetermination of the deficiency was in the usual form setting forth the deficiency letter of the Commissioner and his exceptions to the Commissioner’s determination. It admits that there was income taxable to the amount of $6,846.31, but complains that a deficiency assessment of an additional $5,776.89 was erroneously made.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. Kirby Lumber CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Helvering v. American Chicle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Hollwedel v. Duffy-Mott Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bradford Hotel Operating Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. James David KimmelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. James David KimmelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API