Legal Opinion
United States v. James David Kimmel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 5, 1982No. 80-1562Published
1Opinion of the Court
672 F.2d 720
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James David KIMMEL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 80-1562.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 12, 1981.
Decided March 4, 1982.
As Amended March 29 and April 5, 1982.
Gordon M. Bronson, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant-appellant.
Stephen D. Tom, Asst. U. S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii.
Before SKELTON,* Senior Judge, CHOY and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
1
James David Kimmel appeals his convictions for distributing and…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Willie James Brown v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.