Legal Opinion

State v. Bohuk

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 21, 1994PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

269 N.J. Super. 581 (1994)

636 A.2d 105

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

EDWARD BOHUK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted December 13, 1993.

Decided January 21, 1994.

Before Judges PETRELLA, BAIME and VILLANUEVA.

Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Mark E. Tabakman, designated counsel, on the brief).

Robert W. Gluck, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the letter-brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

Following a…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. StasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. State v. DreherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. State of New Jersey v. Stephon G. WrightNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  4. State v. BohukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DARIUS D. BRIDGES (17-03-0317, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API