Legal Opinion

State v. Stas

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 12, 2012PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Patterson

The Court considers the appeal of defendant Manaf Stas, who was convicted of allowing an intoxicated person to operate a vehicle, over which he had custody and control, in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-50(a). Defendant and another individual, Joseph Putz, were involved in an automobile accident in a minivan owned by defendant’s sister, minutes after leaving a bar where both had been drinking. After police arrived on the scene, Putz told the investigating police officer that he had been driving the vehicle at *41the time of the accident. After failing field sobriety tests, Putz was arrested and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. SantamariaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  2. State v. Bruno Gibson (072257)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  3. State v. David Bueso(074261)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  4. State v. CarreroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  5. State v. GibsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API