Dangerfield v. Markel
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
This appeal arises as a result of our decision in Dangerfield v. Markel, 252 N.W.2d 184 (N.D.1977), in which we held that Markel, a potato grower, breached a contract with Dangerfield, a potato broker, to deliver potatoes, thus giving rise to damages under the Uniform Commercial Code. On remand the district court awarded Dangerfield $47,510.16 in damages plus interest and costs less an award to Markel of $3,840.68 plus interest. Markel appeals contending, among other things, that the district court made an erroneous award of damages to Dangerfield, and Dangerfield…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Laredo Hides Co., Inc. v. H & H Meat Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Haugeberg v. HaugebergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Jamestown Terminal Elevator, Inc. v. HiebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. ConwayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Nebraska Builders Products Co. v. Industrial Erectors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Black v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Red River Commodities, Inc. v. EidsnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Leininger v. SolaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.