Legal Opinion

Dangerfield v. Markel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1979No. Civ. 9277-APublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises as a result of our decision in Dangerfield v. Markel, 252 N.W.2d 184 (N.D.1977), in which we held that Markel, a potato grower, breached a contract with Dangerfield, a potato broker, to deliver potatoes, thus giving rise to damages under the Uniform Commercial Code. On remand the district court awarded Dangerfield $47,510.16 in damages plus interest and costs less an award to Markel of $3,840.68 plus interest. Markel appeals contending, among other things, that the district court made an erroneous award of damages to Dangerfield, and Dangerfield…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Laredo Hides Co., Inc. v. H & H Meat Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Haugeberg v. HaugebergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Jamestown Terminal Elevator, Inc. v. HiebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. ConwayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Nebraska Builders Products Co. v. Industrial Erectors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Black v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Red River Commodities, Inc. v. EidsnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Leininger v. SolaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API