Legal Opinion

Dirk Webster v. Jack R. Duckworth, Warden and the Indiana Attorney General, Respondents

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 11, 1985No. 83-3096PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMBERS, Senior Circuit Judge.

The question presented by this appeal from a judgment denying a state prisoner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is whether, following the highest state court’s reversal of the prisoner’s first degree murder conviction on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence, the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution barred retrial of the prisoner on the same charges. We hold, on the authority of Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1 (1978), that the double jeopardy clause did bar retrial.

Dirk Webster appeals from a judgment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Nelson v. O'NEILSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. James Douglas, Martin L. Pruitt, Leon MasonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Raymond ShoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. State v. LizzolNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Crutchfield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API