Thelma Aisola v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
GUIDRY, Justice.
| plaintiffs, alleging to be putative class members of multiple class actions, have filed their own individual suits against' the defendant, Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (Citizens). Citizens excepted on grounds of prescription and lis pendens. At issue is whether the doctrine of lis pendens bars plaintiffs’ suits where the plaintiffs were not named parties in the first-filed, class actions. For the reasons set forth below, we find the trial court erred in overruling the defendant’s exception of lis pendens.
FACTS
Plaintiffs were residents of, and owned homes…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Duckworth v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Quinn v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair PlanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- UNITED GENERAL TITLE INS. v. Casey Title, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Domingue v. ABC CORP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- An Erny Girl, L.L.C. v. BCNO 4 L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Parker v. Tulane-Loyola Federal Credit UnionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Hawkins v. Span Systems, Inc./DFW International Airport OCIPLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Trouth Air Conditioning & Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Bay Electric Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Brown v. New York Life Insurance CoDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.