Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Kunkle

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1900No. 3,161PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Erom the Wells Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

A demurrer for want of sufficient facts to the complaint of the appellant against the appellees was sustained. The complaint was based upon a written instrument alleged to have been executed by the appellant on the 13th of May, 1897, to the appellee Kunkle, and by him assigned in writing on the 3rd of July, 1897, to the other defendant, the Ohio & Indiana Oil Company, which caused it to be recorded in the office of the recorder of Hancock county on the 19th of March, 1898; the instrument and assignment being set out in the complaint. The written instrument was as follows: “In consideration of…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Union Gas & Oil Co. v. Wiedeman Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1924
  2. Deming Inv. Co. v. LanhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Stovall v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. United States v. Comet Oil & Gas Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Stine v. Producers' Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API