Cobb v. Coffey
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for specific performance. Before Judge Tarver. Murray superior court. August 14, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
1. The assignment of error, complaining of the refusal of the judge to allow a witness on direct examination to answer a question, which fails to specify what the witness would have testified had he been permitted to answer the question, is insufficient to present any question for decision. Rogers v. Condon, 144 Ga. 390 (3) (87 S. E. 397); Featherston v. American National Bank, 146 Ga. 13 (90 S. E. 282).
2. Applying the principles announced in the former rulings in this case the court did not err, under the, pleadings and evidence, in granting a non-suit. Coffey v. Cobb, 140 Ga. 661 (79 S. E.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coffey v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Rogers v. CondonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Coffey v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Coffey v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Featherston v. American National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Clare v. DrexlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Jones v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Wyche v. Bank of Campbell CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1925