Legal Opinion

Featherston v. American National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 18, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Mathews. Bibb superior court. January 29, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. A ground of a motion for new trial, complaining of a refusal of the court to allow a party testifying in his own behalf to answer a question propounded to him by counsel, presents no question for review, where it is not stated that the court was informed of the expected reply. Rogers v. Condon, 144 Ga. 390 (87 S. E. 397) ; Flemister v. Central Georgia Power Co., 140 Ga. 511 (79 S. E. 148).

2. Certain testimony to the effect that the plaintiff did not lend a stated amount of money to a named person, offered upon the trial of issues formed by the petition as amended and the plea of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flemister v. Central Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Rogers v. CondonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clare v. DrexlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Wilson v. DunawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Cobb v. CoffeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Wyche v. Bank of Campbell CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API