Legal Opinion
In re: Babbitt v. (Thornberry Fee Application)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 19, 2002No. 98-0001PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Special Court filed PER CURIAM.
Separate opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Senior Circuit Judge CUDAHY.
2Per curiam
ORDER
This matter coming to be heard and being heard before the Special Division of the Court upon the petition of B. J. Thornberry for reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to section 593(f) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended, 28 U.S.C. § 591 et seq. *55(1994), and it appearing to the.court for the reasons set forth more fully in the opinion filed contemporaneously herewith* that the petition is not well taken, it is hereby
ORDERED,…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- In Re Oliver L. North (Shultz Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Samuel R. PierceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- In re: Babbitt v. (Thornberry Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002