Legal Opinion

Utah Oil Refining Co. v. Millard County Drainage Dist. No. 4

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1935No. 5491PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

The three plaintiffs, Utah Oil Refining Company, Inter-mountain Building & Loan Association, and Hadlock, as receiver for the Delta State Bank, brought this action, not to quiet title to the lands set out in the complaint, but to have canceled, annulled, and purged from the records certain purported drainage taxes levied against the lands after the title had passed to the county by auditor’s deed for the unpaid general taxes for the year 1920.' The complaint further prayed that drainage district No. 4 and its supervisors, the county commissioners, the county auditor, the county…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Painter v. PainterOhio Supreme Court · 1849
  2. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rld. v. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. Hanson v. BurrisUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Coler v. Board of Com'rs of Stanly CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krofcheck v. Ensign Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Upper Blue Bench Irr. Dist. v. Continental Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Upper Blue Bench Irr. Dist. v. Continental Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API