Legal Opinion
United States v. Kye Soo Lee, Min Ho Chay, and Min Sik Lee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 22, 1992No. 91-4762PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge:
The Government appeals the judgment of the district court on remand, granting the defendants’ motion to suppress predicated on its findings of lack of defendants’ consent to accompany officers to state police headquarters and the absence of probable cause to arrest. We reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
The story of Kye Soo Lee, Min Ho Chay (Chay) and Min Sik Lee’s indictment for trafficking counterfeit goods in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2320 begins on May 27, 1988, at approximately 5:50 p.m., when Louisiana State…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. PackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Blackwell v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Robin Lynn Bailey v. Anthony Newland, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. WaldropCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.