Hicks v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The verdict was amply supported by the evidence, and there was no error in overruling the general grounds of tbe motion for new trial.
The accused insists that the court erred in not declaring a mistrial, by reason of a remark by the assistant solicitor-general in his concluding argument to the jury, as follows: “Anything less than the death penalty would be a mockery.” Counsel for accused promptly said: “We object to that, and ask for a mistrial in this case.” The court denied said motion for mistrial, making the statement, “I will strike…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Manchester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- McLendon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.