Legal Opinion

Le Blanc v. United Irrigation & Rice Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1911No. 18,467Published

Appeal from Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Acadia; William Campbell, Judge. Action by Dupre Le Blanc, Jr., against the United Irrigation & Rice Milling Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion

On the Merits.

The decedent was at work at the place assigned to him by the miller or foreman at *199the time that he came in fatal contact with the revolving machine of defendant’s mill.

That part of the mill consists of a machine known as a “reel.”

Each large mill operates five or six of these reels. They are indispensable in a rice mill. They, among other things, clean the rice, separate the straw from the rice.

The shaft revolves at about the rate of 76 revolutions a minute, and on this shaft there is a cogwheel, small in diameter, and a large wheel, the former moving the latter at a speed of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bourg v. Brownell-Drews Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Ingerman v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Brinkman v. St. Landry Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. Carter v. Fred W. Dubach Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  5. Jones v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API