Legal Opinion
Kane v. City of Bainbridge Island
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 2, 2011No. 3:10-cv-05731-RBLPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Dkt. # 30]
RONALD B. LEIGHTON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendant City of Bainbridge Island’s Motion for Summary Judgment. [Dkt. # 30].
This is a ease about a land use dispute involving Plaintiffs waterfront property on Bainbridge Island. When Plaintiff bought it, the property could not be developed because it lay completely within a wetland buffer. The City offered a use exception to allow some building on the property. Even when Plaintiff exceeded the limits of the exception by developing the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BOFI Federal Bank v. Advance Funding LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015