Legal Opinion

Bevilacqua v. Sutter

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 24, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

26 N.J. Super. 394 (1953)

98 A.2d 60

REMA BEVILACQUA, AS ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF ANTONIO BEVILACQUA, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

ALEXANDER SUTTER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 15, 1953.

Decided June 24, 1953.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, SMALLEY and SCHETTINO.

Mr. George Pellettieri argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Lester C. Leonard argued the cause for the respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SMALLEY, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

This is an appeal by the plaintiff Rema Bevilacqua, as administratrix ad…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Atlantic City & Shore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  2. McKinney v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. Mackenzie v. OakleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  4. Cleary v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  5. Marzotto v. Gay Garment Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eaton v. EatonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. Hartpence v. GrouleffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. State v. WenzelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  4. Thering v. ReinkemeyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. Foulke v. MeilutaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API